June 15, 2006 \ 5 Comments
Have you recently performed a Google search and been disappointed to discover that you can't find what you need? This doesn't happen very often, but I'm here to suggest that it's going to start happening more and more. The World Wide Web is getting overcrowded and the amount of information available is exceeding the needs of the most cerebral users.
With the prevalent age of Web 2.0, pretty much anyone with a pulse and even some advanced chimps can publish something online. MySpace is living proof that the Internet is exponentially accelerating its evolution from a repository of information to a junkyard of teenager chat logs and emoticons. The increasing size and decreasing utility of the Net poses two significant problems:
- Problem 1: Providing Information – It is becoming much harder to create a name for yourself. Just about every reasonable domain name has been snatched by Kenya Tech and other making-life-miserable-for-less institutions. You have likely noticed that new businesses hitting the market have strange and/or long domain names. One I heard recently on the radio is saltlakecityhelpwanted.com which even notes their long domain name in their marketing slogan.
Once you do get up online, you suddenly realize that you're a Chinese person in China. Big whoop. Whatever you're saying is being said already and whatever you're selling is on eBay for less. Sticking out on the web requires old fashioned techniques: TV and radio advertising, as well as having your latest book at B&N. Business presence is rapidly becoming a prerequisite to web presence for companies. And just for the record, this whole idea that floats around among naive start-ups that if you build a website you'll be instantly wealthy is less realistic than a beer commercial. Making sales requires marketing, not magic.
- Problem 2: Finding Information – Google is becoming an increasingly sophisticated engine. Their developers are constantly looking for ways to more accurately spider the web and match its content to searches. Even grandma is starting to learn how to modify her search parameters and use regular expressions lest she get pages of results she doesn't need. The problem is that there is too much information. Archives are piling up so that a search about a bug in your PHP code returns a forum post from 1999, four versions ago. And as stated before, as long as everyone can have their space on the web, this is only going to get worse.
So what's the solution? I don't know. But here's an idea: clearer information demarcation. The web may have to start being broken up in to categories which are separated by ports or perhaps more domain extensions (.com, .net, etc.). Want to learn about animals? Go to the biology net (.bio). Need help debugging that C++? Use the technology net (.tech). I think that was the original intent of ICANN, but there is no real regulation of what people do with domains (except .gov, .mil, .edu and other government-controlled ones).
Hopefully something cool will come along that will make this entire article invalid. Until then, we all face the reality that surfing is being replaced with sorting.
Tags:
content, crowded, internet, supersaturated, web
Interesting article. For me, Google has always been a sorting engine.
The reason good domains are hard to come by is that they are the real estate you build your web business on. Just like a brick and mortar store, you want a location that is highly trafficked. Millions of people type in domain names rather than searching on search engines and the domain owner is in position to capitalize on this practice. Just like physical real estate, you need to be willing to open up the wallet to get a prime location. I recently attended a domain auction and people were buying single domain names for over 50K. You can see last week domain sales here: http://dnjournal.com/domainsales.htm
As for the search problem, there are companies out there developing solutions. Try openlist.com and look for a restaurant. You will find an aggregation of all reviews on the net, price ranges, maps, etc. Local vertical search will be the next big thing.
I agree with you that ICANN had a good idea with sorting the web name through extensions, but failed to regulate and will probably never be able to make it right.
I liked the beer commercial part. K bye.
Web 2.0 isn't the problem, it's the solution. Sites like Digg.com and stubledupon.com let humans sort through the mess in a way that no search engine can. The important stuff floats to the top when millions of eyes scan it and determin it's value. Additional classification may help, but the social web will be (and already is) the real answer.
Digg is a pretty good idea. Looks like I've addressed the dark side of the Web 2.0 force, and the good side is providing solutions for the bucket of schlockbuke the Internet finds itself in.